The National Labor Relations Commission modified the computation of reliefs of backwages and separation pay to an illegally dismissed employee, in view of her rejection of an alleged offer of reinstatement by the employer. Was this modification sustained by the Supreme Court?
Find out why the Supreme Court pierced the corporate veil in this case.
The employee alleged that his employer asked for his resignation. Will this be enough to declare the illegality of his dismissal from employment?
Note the significance of the company-designated physician’s duty to provide a final and definite medical assessment.
The employer argued that just cause attended her decision to dismiss the employee from service, but she was able to present supporting documents only when she filed her appeal. Should the NLRC be precluded from receiving such evidence on appeal?
The employees in this case alleged that they were verbally informed of their dismissal from employment and prohibited from further rendering service. Did the Supreme Court rule in their favor?
Check whether the employer succeeded in justifying its decision to dismiss an employee on the ground of loss of trust and confidence.
Amendment to Section 12, Rule 1, Book VI of the Rules Implementing the Labor Code of the Philippines (on suspension of employment relationship).
Find out whether the complainants (who were hired by a foreign company) were granted their claim of illegal dismissal allegedly done by its local subsidiary.
Check whether the employer’s denial of contract substitution was given credence by the Supreme Court.