Why did the Supreme Court disagree with GSIS’ assertion of exemption from CARL coverage?
The employee contended that his dismissal was illegal for being based on a vague company rule. Did the Supreme Court agree?
The respondent in a complaint for illegal dismissal pointed out that a different person was the employer of the complainant. Did the Supreme Court uphold respondent’s claim?
Find out why the Supreme Court declared the illegality of the employee’s dismissal from employment despite the employer’s notice to the DOLE and the employee.
Find out how this employee successfully claimed retirement benefits despite the employer’s lack of a written retirement plan.
Learn the requirements for validly placing an employee on floating status.
What effect would a refusal on the part of the seafarer to comply with his medical treatment have on his claim for disability benefits?
May the managerial employees in this case be entitled to optional retirement benefits under a collective bargaining agreement?
The Supreme Court clarified the 120/240 day rule with regard to the extent of the disability of the seafarer as against the company-designated physician’s duty to issue a final medical assessment.
In case the doctor appointed by the seafarer disagrees with the assessment of the company-designated physician, who has the duty to secure the opinion of a third doctor?